From: Pilgrimpub@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 6:42 PM
Subject: SBC AND OLD LANDMARKISM [02/23--2005
IS "OLD LANDMARKISM" RAISING ITS HOARY HEAD
IN THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION AGAIN? [02/23--2005]

This week I was rather surprised to read an article in the Southern Baptist of Texas Convention's TEXAN Magazine by Pastor Jim Richards, Executive Director of the SBTC, which appears to me to smack of elements of "Old Landmarkism."

The Southern Baptist Convention had a split by "Landmarkers" in the early 1900s who formed the Amercian Baptist Association, now headquartered in Texarkana, Texas. Elements of Landmarkism, however, still remained in the SBC, and now there seems to be a surfacing of some of these elements.

For the benefit of any readers who do not know recent Southern Baptist history in the state of Texas, the SBTC is a new convention formed in 1998 by Baptist churches in Texas which are loyal to the "conservative resurgence" in the Southern Baptist Convention. It was started here in Houston when a number of churches split from the Baptist General Convention of Texas.

The SBCT stands for the inerrancy of Holy Spirit-inspired Scripture in contrast to the leadership of the BGCT which repudiates "inerrancy" as being a "political" weapon allegedly used by "fundamentalists" against "mainstream Baptists." The TEXAN is the magazine for the SBTC while the BAPTIST STANDARD represents the BGCT.

From my personal perspective, I was happy to see Southern Baptists across the nation gradually bring the Convention back to the historic confessional Baptist faith over the past 40-plus years and turn back the tide of Neo-orthodoxy which had permeated the seminaries' faculties over a half century ago. I rejoiced to see scores of Texas churches take a stand for inspired Scripture and support the "conservative resurgence" rather than continue supporting the BGCT under the leadership and influence of anti-inerrantists such as John Baugh, Herbert Reynolds, Charles Wade, Russell Dilday and others of the "Texas Baptist Committed" variety.

But -- after having freed themselves of the shackles of their former denominational leaders -- are some Southern Baptists now trying to impose the ecclesiastical shackles of "Old Landmarkism" upon the Baptist pastors and churches of Texas and the Southern Baptist Convention? If the article by Pastor Jim Richards is indicative of the thinking of many in leadership of the SBC, it appears that this may be the case.

It seems that the SBC mission board has recently adopted some "guidelines" which smell of the rags of "Old Landmarkism" -- not only on the matter of the "proper administrator" of baptism, but on the idea that a church's belief of the doctrine of eternal security is somehow related to the authenticity of baptism.

Evidently, one of the victims of this move toward Landmarkism is Pastor Wade Burleson of Emmanuel Baptist Church, Enid, Oklahoma. As I understand it, Pastor Burleson (whom I have never met) is going to be relieved of his position as a Trustee of the Southern Baptist Convention's International Mission Board, and elements of "Landmarkism" apparently are involved.

The following is an email I sent to Pastor Burleson earlier today:

>>
Dear Brother Burleson:

I have read some of your comments on Landmarkism, and I surely hate to see it apparently rising again to some significance among Southern Baptists.

I spent the first several years of my Christian life in Landmarkism, after having been baptized at Parkview Baptist, Jackson, Tennessee in 1953 by a godly and beloved Pastor (now deceased) who introduced me to the writings of J. R. Graves.

I left the SBC over Neo-orthodoxy in the schools (particularly at Union University) in 1954, and spent the next eleven years of my life advocating Landmarkism among independent Baptists. In the Providence of God, I was enabled by His grace to study my way out of it and abandoned it in 1964.

Since I knew Landmarkism very well from the "inside" of independent Baptists and saw its divisive and sectarian character, I wrote a book, OLD LANDMARKISM AND THE BAPTISTS, briefly discussing the history and teachings of Graves and other Landmark Baptists, including myself. If you have not seen the book, I will be happy to send you a free copy. It is a 188-page paperback, fully documented. 

Over the past 41 years, I have received many testimonies from readers -- especially preachers -- who have been helped by my various writings on the erroneous theories and practices of Landmarkism.

Here in Texas, as recently as this week I read the SBTC Texan magazine article by Jim Richards which advocated some of the principles involved in Landmarkism (Feb. 6, 2006, page 5). I hate to see the SBTC leadership get on this dead-end trail which leads to the type of Landmark sectarianism which I have witnessed among independent Baptists, the American Baptist Association (Texarkana headquarters), and the Baptist Missionary Association (Little Rock headquarters).

I have tried my best to maintain fellowship with Christian brethren who hold to Landmarkism, but they usually have held me at arm's length and regard me as a heretic!

Bob L. Ross
Pilgrim Publications
Pasadena, Texas

Website Advertisement: >>http://members.aol.com/pilgrimpub/writings.htm#_ROSS_10<<

"Old Landmarkism" and the Baptists

An examination of the erroneous theories of "CHURCH AUTHORITY" and "CHURCH SUCCESSION" of the so-called "LANDMARK BAPTIST" movement.

            The term LANDMARKISM is a nickname which refers to ecclesiastical views arranged as a logical system or ecclesiastical order and popularized by the late James Robinson Graves (1820-1893). According to Landmarkers, there is no authority in either the Word or from the Spirit for doing the work of the Great Commission; this authority comes solely from the local Baptist church.

            It is held in theory by an undetermined number of Baptists in various conventions, associations, fellowships and independent churches. The system, sometimes called "church truth," is not exclusive to the Association Baptists, but according to Dr. I. K. Cross, the term "Landmarkism" has been widely used in "derision" for those Baptists in the fellowship of the American Baptist Association of Churches with which Dr. Cross is affiliated. There are quite a number of independent churches that are Landmark, but they do not affiliate with a convention or association. Usually, these churches do not believe there is scriptural authority for anything larger than the local church, although many of them do affiliate in "fellowships" and special "conferences."
           Landmarkism involves the authenticity of a church as an organization, the administration and administrator of baptism, and the ordination of ministers. It is asserted that a church is unscriptural, baptism is invalid, and ministers are not duly ordained unless there is proper Church Authority for them. This is Landmarkism's "chief cornerstone."
Some writers of the past referred to this position as "high churchism." Consequently, the
          Landmark view is that Baptist Churches ALONE have the authority of Christ to evangelize, baptize and carry out all aspects of the commission. The system further involves the perpetuity, succession, or continuity of Baptist churches through which authority has descended through the ages and will continue. This position, though not uniformly defined among Landmarkers, is believed to have been taught by Christ in such verses as Matthew 16:18, 28:19-20.
          While Landmarkers in general profess either an inability to demonstrate the succession or no necessity of doing so, their efforts to advocate their system of "church truth" are almost invariably characterized by several quotations from secondary sources and their own respected authors, supposedly establishing the historical claim. Generally therefore, they believe that
          1) the true and scriptural organization of a church,
          2) the valid administration of baptism, and --
          3) the proper ordination of a gospel minister,
all MUST all be enacted upon the authority of a sound and true, scriptural church — namely, a church that was born through the authority of a "mother" church — continuing in like manner back to the original apostolic church of Matthew 28 where "church authority" first "began".

          In refuting these errors, Baptists and other Christians today can believe in the continuity of Christianity since Christ and may devote themselves to regulating their faith and practice by the Scriptures (in an orderly manner) without adhering to the Landmark teachings of church authority and succession. The authority which validates baptism, or any other scriptural action of our time, does not reside in the church institution any more than does the authority which validates salvation itself; authority resides in Jesus Christ and is expressed in His Word. The church itself is dependent upon this authority, but this authority is not dependent upon the church.
          This book advocates no new or novel views in opposition to Landmarkism. The first Confession of Faith set forth by English Particular Baptists is the well-known Confession of 1644, and in Article 41 it states:

         "The persons designed by Christ, to dispense this ordinance (baptism), the Scriptures hold forth to be a preaching disciple, it being no where tied to a particular church, officer, or person extraordinarily sent, the commission enjoining the administration, being given to them under no other consideration, but as considered disciples."

          Landmarkism, as a system, is of relatively recent origin among the Baptists, although various items in the system have been obvious at certain times in our history. But at least not until J. R. Graves popularized all of the related concepts in systematic form did a significant segment of Baptists finally become a fragmentation from other Baptists (in the Preface of his book, Old Landmarkism — What Is It?, Graves takes credit for "inaugurating the reform" which became known as Landmarkism).
         May this book assist all who read it to see Landmarkism in its proper perspective among the Baptists. -- Bob L. Ross


C. H. SPURGEON (The Sword and Trowel, 1974, page 267, 268):

From "Fragments of Popery Among Nonconformists" --

It is very natural that our friends should desire their minister to baptize them, and yet there is no reason why he should do so on account of his office. It does not appear from the Scriptures to have been an act peculiar to preachers; in fact, at least one of them, and he by no means the least, was not sent to baptize, but to preach the gospel. A vigorous Christian member of the church is far more in his place in the baptismal waters than his ailing, consumptive, or rheumatic pastor. Any objection urged against this assertion is another unconscious leaning to tradition, if not a relic of superstition.

The usefulness of the ordinance does not depend upon the baptizer, but upon the gracious meditation and earnest prayer of the person baptized: the good which he will receive will depend upon how far his whole soul is receptive of the divine influence, and in no sense, manner, or degree upon the agent of the baptism.

We do not know what Paedobaptists think upon their ceremony, but we fear that the most of them must have the minister to do it, and would hardly like their infants to be left to the operation of an unordained man. If it be so, we do not so very much wonder at their belief, for as it is clear that no good arises to an infant from its own prayers or meditations during the ceremony, there is a natural tendency to look for some official importance in the performer of the rite; but yet we do not and cannot believe that our Paedobaptist friends have fallen so low as that; we make no charge, and hope we shall never have cause to do so.

For Baptists to attach the smallest importance to the ordinance of baptism being administered either by a minister or a private member would be to the last degree inconsistent, and yet we are not sure that the inconsistency is not to be found in many quarters. It behooves ministers to break down in time every tendency to make us into necessary adjuncts of the ordinances, for this is one step towards making us priests.


***************************************************************************

Permission granted to copy and use this article.
Pilgrim Website:  >www.pilgrimpublications.com< or >http://members.aol.com/pilgrimpub/index.htm<
By request, names are added to my Email List, or removed

Publishers of C. H. Spurgeon's Sermons & Other Works
Send your snail-mail address for a printed Price List.
Pilgrim Publications, Box 66, Pasadena, TX 77501
Phone: (713) 477-4261.   Fax: (713) 477-7561

Other Internet Resources on Spurgeon:

SingleVision Ministries >http://www.seegod.org/<
Spurgeon.US >http://www.spurgeon.us/index.php<
Spurgeon Archive >http://www.spurgeon.org/mainpage.htm<
Spurgeon Gems >http://www.spurgeongems.org/<
"The Prince of Preachers Live!" >http://www.charlesspurgeon.net/<
Christian Classics >http://www.ccel.org/s/spurgeon/<
Spurgeon sermons in SPANISH >http://www.spurgeon.com.mx/<
Spurgeon's Devotionals >http://www.gospelweb.net/table1fcb.htm<
CHS' Sermons on Cassette >http://www.chspurgeon.com/<