TRUETT THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
PROFESSOR ALLEGES IN
TEXAS MAGAZINE THAT PAUL MADE AN ERROR
Roger Olsen was hired by Truett Baptist Theological
Seminary, located on the Baylor University campus at Waco, Texas, a few years
ago to teach theology.
In a recent issue of the eroding Baptist General
Convention of Texas' magazine, Baptist Standard, Professor Olsen
contributed an article in the 'Opinion' column, entitled, "Why 'inerrancy'
doesn't matter." [Baptist Standard, February 6, 2006]. See this
Olsen expresses the usual condemnatory view on "inerrancy" as
disseminated by the current leadership of the Baptist General Convention
of Texas denominational machine in their opposition to the historical view of
Baptists on Holy Spirit-inspired Scripture.
The word "inerrancy" is a
taboo word in BGCT leadership circles when referring to Holy
Spirit-inspired Scripture. It has become the "shibboleth" by means of which
the BGCT leadership can decipher friends and foes. If you confess that the Holy
Spirit inspired the original writings by prophets and apostles which comprise
Scripture, then you are the "enemy," branded with the "F" word, and you are akin
in your disposition to a Muslim fundamentalist -- maybe even worse.
you dare use "inerrant" in application to the writings of those who wrote
Scripture under the Divine inspiration of the Holy Spirit, you are branded by
the BGCT leaders as a "fundamentalist," and usually with one or more deprecating
invectives accompanying -- such as "extremist, fanatical . . . narrow,
self-righteous, smug, judgmental, rigid, angry, combative, negative, critical,
sanctimonious, and hypocritical" -- according to Paul Powell, current
president of Truett, and Russell Dilday who is quoted by Powell in a
booklet entitled, "This we believe," which was recently mailed to
churches throughout Texas.
Both Powell and Dilday are longtime
chums of BGCT power-broker, Houston multi-millionaire John Baugh.
It has often been widely publicized that Baugh donated millions of dollars to
help establish and build the Truett Seminary in the effort to counteract
"fundamentalism" in Baptist theological education in Texas.
Baugh and his close associate, Herbert Reynolds, have been devoted to
"protecting" the BGCT from "fundamentalism." In the recent past, when the Baylor
Board of Regents failed to remove Baylor president Robert Sloan --
who evidently was too conservative for Baugh -- Baugh strongly intimated that
he wanted the multi-millions of dollars returned which he had donated to
Baylor. It wasn't long afterwards that Sloan presented his
According to the Baptist Standard of July 23,
"In spite of boasts by his opponents that they had the
votes to unseat him, Baylor University regents took no vote on
embattled President Robert Sloan, other than affirming the
long-range plan that has become the centerpiece of his presidency. . .
Regents responded last September by affirming Sloan by a 31-4
vote. But at the board’s May meeting, he came within one vote of losing his job.
During a closed-door session, a motion to ask for Sloan’s resignation
failed by an 18-17 secret ballot.
At that same meeting, John
Baugh, a major Baylor benefactor from Houston, warned he would
ask the university to repay loans and return financial gifts he made if the
board failed to rescue Baylor from “the paralyzing quagmire in which it
currently is ensnared.”
Sloan announced in early 2005 that
he would resign as president of Baylor.
If Truett's hiring of Olsen and
Olsen's article about "inerrancy" are indicative of the direction of the Truett
Seminary and the BGCT, it is evident that these Baptists are still on the same
downgrade which has cost the BGCT the loss of a great numbers of pastors
and churches which formed the Southern Baptists of Texas Convention which
was formed by inerrantists a few years ago.
The BGCT is now apparently
attempting to recover its numerical and financial status by making a special
inclusive effort toward the black Baptists and Latino Baptists. This effort may
prove to be a costly move, however, since most black Baptists and Latino
Baptists with whom I am acquainted believe in the inerrancy of Holy
BGCT leadership continues to wage verbal
warfare against the historical Baptist belief that the prophets and apostles
were so inspired by the Holy Spirit in what they wrote that they did not make
any errors. And as long as men such as Olsen teach at Truett, the BGCT need have
no fears about anyone's being infected with "inerrantism" at the Seminary.
Olsen accuses the apostle Paul of an "error" in First Corinthians
10:8 where Paul says 23,000 fell in one day. Olsen believes this is an an
error since Moses referred to 24,000 dying in the plague of Numbers
25:1-9. In addition, Olsen takes some potshots at those who have advocated the
inerrancy of Holy Spirit-inspired Scripture -- such as Princeton theologians
Archibald Alexander, Charles Hodge, A. A. Hodge, B. B. Warfield and J. Gresham
Machen. He also is critical of Harold Lindsell's book, The Battle for the
Bible, in which Lindsell contends for the inerrancy view which Olsen
This incongruency of 23,000 by Paul and 24,000 by Moses is an
error, all right -- but it was not Paul's. It is Olsen's.
Gleason Archer Jr. shows in his book, Encyclopedia of Bible
Difficulities (pages 141, 401), Paul is not referring to the same
plague as Moses referred to, but Paul refers to the deaths which resulted
from the idolatrous incident of the golden calf in Exodus 32.
might assume that Olsen should know this, considering his reported extensive
But if Vice President
Cheney is capable of mistaking a lawyer for a quail, I suppose Olsen is capable
of also firing at the wrong target in regard to biblical interpretation.
Despite the fact Olsen does not believe in the inerrancy of Holy
Spirit-inspired Scripture, he nevertheless says he does believe the Bible is
"authoritative, supernaturally inspired, and infallible," notwithstanding
the fact that the orginal writers lacked inerrancy in what they wrote.
This might make one wonder which time the Bible is
authoritative, supernaturally inspired, and infallible -- (1) Paul's 23,000 or
(2) Moses' 24,000?
Since Olsen alleges it was Paul who made the "error,"
I assume only Moses' 24,000 could be the authoritative, supernaturally inspired,
infallible number. Unless, of course, Olsen has some way to explain how an
"error" can also be authorittive, supernaturally inspired and
-- Bob L. Ross
granted to copy and use this article.
By request, names are
added to my Email List, or removed
Publishers of C. H. Spurgeon's
Sermons & Other Works
Send your snail-mail address for a printed Price
Pilgrim Publications, Box 66, Pasadena, TX 77501
477-4261. Fax: (713) 477-7561
Other Internet Resources on
SingleVision Ministries >http://www.seegod.org/<